| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Spatial component in Oracle Database 9.0.1.5 FIPS+, 9.2.0.8, 9.2.0.8DV, and 10.1.0.5 has unknown impact and remote attack vectors, aka DB06. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the Upgrade/Downgrade component in Oracle Database 9.2.0.8, 10.1.0.5, and 10.2.0.3 has unknown impact and remote attack vectors, aka DB05. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the Advanced Queuing component in Oracle Database 9.0.1.5 FIPS+ and 10.1.0.5 has unknown impact and remote attack vectors, aka DB03. |
| Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in Oracle Database 9.0.1.5 FIPS+, 9.2.0.8, 9.2.0.8DV, 10.1.0.5, and 10.2.0.3 have unknown impact and remote attack vectors, related to the (1) Advanced Queuing component (DB02) and (2) Oracle Spatial component (DB04). |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the XML DB component in Oracle Database 9.2.0.8, 9.2.0.8DV, 10.1.0.5, and 10.2.0.3 has unknown impact and remote attack vectors, aka DB01. |
| The installation process for Oracle 10g and llg uses accounts with default passwords, which allows remote attackers to obtain login access by connecting to the Listener. NOTE: at the end of the installation, if performed using the Database Configuration Assistant (DBCA), most accounts are disabled or their passwords are changed. |
| Oracle allows remote attackers to obtain server memory contents via crafted packets, aka Oracle reference number 7892711. NOTE: as of 20071016, the only disclosure is a vague pre-advisory with no actionable information. However, since it is from a well-known researcher, it is being assigned a CVE identifier for tracking purposes. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Internet Directory component in Oracle Database 9.2.0.8 and 9.2.0.8DV, and Oracle Application Server 9.0.4.3, 10.1.3.0.0 up to 10.1.3.3.0, and 10.1.2.0.1 up to 10.1.2.2.0, has unknown impact and remote attack vectors, aka AS05. |
| Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in the CTXSYS Intermedia application for the Oracle Text component (CTX_DOC) in Oracle Database 10.1.0.5 and 10.2.0.3 allow remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the (1) THEMES, (2) GIST, (3) TOKENS, (4) FILTER, (5) HIGHLIGHT, and (6) MARKUP procedures, aka DB03. NOTE: remote unauthenticated attack vectors exist when CTXSYS is used with oracle Application Server. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the Spatial component in Oracle Database 9.2.0.8 and 9.2.0.8DV has unknown impact and remote attack vectors, aka DB06. |
| Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in Oracle Database 9.0.1.5+, 9.2.0.7, and 10.1.0.5 allow remote authenticated users to have unknown impact via (1) SYS.DBMS_PRVTAQIS in the Advanced Queuing component (DB02) and (2) MDSYS.MD in the Spatial component (DB12). NOTE: Oracle has not disputed reliable researcher claims that DB02 is for SQL injection and DB12 is for a buffer overflow. |
| Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in Oracle Database 9.0.1.5+, 9.2.0.8, 9.2.0.8DV, 10.1.0.5, and 10.2.0.3 allows remote authenticated users to have an unknown impact via (1) SYS.DBMS_DRS in the DataGuard component (DB03), (2) SYS.DBMS_STANDARD in the PL/SQL component (DB10), (3) MDSYS.RTREE_IDX in the Spatial component (DB16), and (4) SQL Compiler (DB17). NOTE: a reliable researcher claims that DB17 is for using Views to perform unauthorized insert, update, or delete actions. |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in boundary_rules.jsp in the Administration Front End for Oracle Enterprise (Ultra) Search, as used in Database Server 9.2.0.8, 10.1.0.5, and 10.2.0.2, and in Application Server 9.0.4.3, 10.1.2.0.2, and 10.1.2.2.0 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTML or web script via the EXPTYPE parameter, aka SES01. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the Upgrade/Downgrade component of Oracle Database 9.0.1.5 and 9.2.0.7 has unknown impact and attack vectors, aka DB13. NOTE: as of 20070424, Oracle has not disputed reliable claims that this is a buffer overflow involving the "mig utility." |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Text component in Oracle Database 9.0.1.5+ and 9.2.0.5 has unknown impact and attack vectors, aka DB12. NOTE: as of 20070424, Oracle has not disputed reliable claims that this involves a buffer overflow in the ctxsrv server daemon. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the Authentication component for Oracle Database 10.1.0.5 and 10.2.0.3 has unknown impact and attack vectors, aka DB05. NOTE: as of 20070424, Oracle has not disputed reliable claims that this issue allows remote authenticated users to bypass the AUTH_ALTER_SESSION security policies via a logon trigger ("AFTER LOGON ON DATABASE" trigger directive), a related issue to CVE-2006-0547. |
| Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in Oracle Database 8.1.7.4 and 9.0.1.5 have unknown impact and attack vectors related to (1) Advanced Security Option and oklist or okdstry (DB10), (2) Oracle Net Services (DB13), and (3) Recovery Manager and oklist (DB16). |
| Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in Oracle Database 9.2.0.7 and 10.1.0.5 have unknown impact and attack vectors related to (1) Export and sys.dbms_logrep_util (DB08), and (2) Oracle Streams and sys.dbms_capture_adm_internal privileges (DB09). NOTE: Oracle has not disputed reliable researcher claims that DB08 is for a buffer overflow in the GET_OBJECT_NAME procedure in the DBMS_LOGREP_UTIL package, and DB09 is for buffer overflows in the CREATE_CAPTURE, ALTER_CAPTURE, and ABORT_TABLE_INSTANTIATION procedures in SYS.DBMS_CAPTURE_ADM_INTERNAL. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Spatial component in Oracle Database 10.2.0.2 has unknown impact and remote authenticated attack vectors related to "create session" privileges, aka Vuln# DB02. NOTE: as of 20061023, Oracle has not disputed reports from reliable third parties that DB02 is for SQL injection in the SDO_DROP_USER_BEFORE package using a Trigger for a DROP USER statement in an anonymous PL/SQL block. |
| Oracle 10g R2 and possibly other versions allows remote attackers to trigger internal errors, and possibly have other impacts, via an "alter session set events" command with invalid arguments. NOTE: this issue was originally disputed by a third party, but the dispute was retracted. NOTE: this issue was called an "integer overflow" in the original source, but this might be incorrect. |
