| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| An issue was discovered in AudioCodes One Voice Operations Center (OVOC) before 8.4.582. Due to improper neutralization of input via the devices API, an attacker can inject malicious JavaScript code (XSS) to attack logged-in administrator sessions. |
| Cybele Software Thinfinity Workspace before v7.0.2.113 was discovered to contain a hardcoded cryptographic key used for encryption. |
| The Shariff Wrapper WordPress plugin before 4.6.10 does not sanitise and escape some of its settings, which could allow high privilege users such as admin to perform Stored Cross-Site Scripting attacks even when the unfiltered_html capability is disallowed (for example in multisite setup) |
| The Nintex Workflow plugin 5.2.2.30 for SharePoint allows XSS. |
| dotCMS before 22.06 allows remote attackers to bypass intended access control and obtain sensitive information by using a semicolon in a URL to introduce a matrix parameter. (This is also fixed in 5.3.8.12, 21.06.9, and 22.03.2 for LTS users.) Some Java application frameworks, including those used by Spring or Tomcat, allow the use of matrix parameters: these are URI parameters separated by semicolons. Through precise semicolon placement in a URI, it is possible to exploit this feature to avoid dotCMS's path-based XSS prevention (such as "require login" filters), and consequently access restricted resources. For example, an attacker could place a semicolon immediately before a / character that separates elements of a filesystem path. This could reveal file content that is ordinarily only visible to signed-in users. This issue can be chained with other exploit code to achieve XSS attacks against dotCMS. |
| An issue was discovered in BMC Remedy before 22.1. Email-based Incident Forwarding allows remote authenticated users to inject HTML (such as an SSRF payload) into the Activity Log by placing it in the To: field. This affects rendering that occurs upon a click in the "number of recipients" field. NOTE: the vendor's position is that "no real impact is demonstrated." |
| Due to insufficient input validation, SAP Financial Consolidation - version 1010, allows an authenticated attacker to inject malicious script when running a common query in the Web Administration Console. On successful exploitation, an attacker can view or modify information causing a limited impact on confidentiality, integrity and availability of the application.
|
| IBM WebSphere Application Server 8.5, and 9.0 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. IBM X-Force ID: 236588. |
| IBM Cloud Pak for Security (CP4S) 1.10.0.0 79and 1.10.2.0 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. IBM X-Force ID: 233663. |
|
IBM InfoSphere Information Server 11.7 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. IBM X-Force ID: 236688.
|
| Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the feedback form of Online Flight Booking Management System v1.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary web scripts or HTML via a crafted payload injected into the airline parameter. |
| The Ultimate Posts Widget WordPress plugin before 2.3.1 does not validate and escape some of its Widget options before outputting them back in attributes, which could allow high privilege users such as admin to perform Stored Cross-Site Scripting attacks even when the unfiltered_html capability is disallowed (for example in multisite setup) |
| The Starbox WordPress plugin before 3.5.0 does not sanitise and escape some parameters, which could allow users with a role as low as Contributor to perform Cross-Site Scripting attacks |
| Xinhu RockOA v2.6.3 was discovered to contain a reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability via the num parameter at /flow/flow.php. |
| Xinhu RockOA v2.6.3 was discovered to contain a reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability via the /kaoqin/tpl_kaoqin_locationchange.html component. |
| zhimengzhe iBarn v1.5 was discovered to contain a reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability via the $search parameter at /own.php. |
| The Frontend Checklist WordPress plugin through 2.3.2 does not sanitise and escape some of its settings, which could allow high privilege users such as admin to perform Stored Cross-Site Scripting attacks even when the unfiltered_html capability is disallowed (for example in multisite setup) |
| The Frontend Checklist WordPress plugin through 2.3.2 does not sanitise and escape some of its settings, which could allow high privilege users such as admin to perform Stored Cross-Site Scripting attacks even when the unfiltered_html capability is disallowed (for example in multisite setup) |
| OP5 Monitor 8.3.1, 8.3.2, and OP5 8.3.3 are vulnerable to Cross Site Scripting (XSS). |
| In OpenNMS Horizon, versions opennms-1-0-stable through opennms-27.1.0-1; OpenNMS Meridian, versions meridian-foundation-2015.1.0-1 through meridian-foundation-2019.1.18-1; meridian-foundation-2020.1.0-1 through meridian-foundation-2020.1.6-1 are vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting, since the function `validateFormInput()` performs improper validation checks on the input sent to the `groupName` and `groupComment` parameters. Due to this flaw, an authenticated attacker could inject arbitrary script and trick other admin users into downloading malicious files which can cause severe damage to the organization using opennms. |
