Search

Search Results (330548 CVEs found)

CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2026-24838 1 Dnnsoftware 1 Dnn Platform 2026-01-29 9.1 Critical
DNN (formerly DotNetNuke) is an open-source web content management platform (CMS) in the Microsoft ecosystem. Prior to versions 9.13.10 and 10.2.0, module title supports richtext which could include scripts that would execute in certain scenarios. Versions 9.13.10 and 10.2.0 contain a fix for the issue.
CVE-2025-69564 1 Code-projects 1 Mobile Shop Management System 2026-01-29 9.8 Critical
code-projects Mobile Shop Management System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in /ExAddNewUser.php via the Name, Address, email, UserName, Password, confirm_password, Role, Branch, and Activate parameters.
CVE-2025-69562 1 Code-projects 1 Mobile Shop Management System 2026-01-29 9.8 Critical
code-projects Mobile Shop Management System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in /insertmessage.php via the userid parameter.
CVE-2025-69559 1 Code-projects 1 Computer Book Store 2026-01-29 9.8 Critical
code-projects Computer Book Store 1.0 is vulnerable to File Upload in admin_add.php.
CVE-2026-24833 1 Dnnsoftware 1 Dnn Platform 2026-01-29 7.7 High
DNN (formerly DotNetNuke) is an open-source web content management platform (CMS) in the Microsoft ecosystem. Prior to versions 9.13.10 and 10.2.0, a module could install with richtext in its description field which could contain scripts that will run for user in the Persona Bar. Versions 9.13.10 and 10.2.0 contain a fix for the issue.
CVE-2025-14610 3 Bloompixel, Elementor, Wordpress 3 Tablemaster For Elementor, Elementor, Wordpress 2026-01-29 7.2 High
The TableMaster for Elementor plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.3.6. This is due to the plugin not restricting which URLs can be fetched when importing CSV data from a URL in the Data Table widget. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Author-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations, including localhost and internal network services, and read sensitive files such as wp-config.php via the 'csv_url' parameter.
CVE-2026-1298 1 Wordpress 1 Wordpress 2026-01-29 5.3 Medium
The Easy Replace Image plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Missing Authorization in all versions up to, and including, 3.5.2. This is due to missing capability checks on the `image_replacement_from_url` function that is hooked to the `eri_from_url` AJAX action. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to replace arbitrary image attachments on the site with images from external URLs, potentially enabling site defacement, phishing attacks, or content manipulation.
CVE-2026-1513 1 Naver 1 Billboard.js 2026-01-29 6.1 Medium
billboard.js before 3.18.0 allows an attacker to execute malicious JavaScript due to improper sanitization during chart option binding.
CVE-2020-36951 1 Geraked 1 Phpscript-sgh 2026-01-29 8.2 High
Phpscript-sgh 0.1.0 contains a time-based blind SQL injection vulnerability in the admin interface that allows attackers to manipulate database queries through the 'id' parameter. Attackers can exploit this vulnerability by crafting malicious payloads that trigger time delays, enabling them to extract sensitive database information through conditional sleep techniques.
CVE-2026-24882 1 Gnupg 1 Gnupg 2026-01-29 8.4 High
In GnuPG before 2.5.17, a stack-based buffer overflow exists in tpm2daemon during handling of the PKDECRYPT command for TPM-backed RSA and ECC keys.
CVE-2025-66199 1 Openssl 1 Openssl 2026-01-29 5.9 Medium
Issue summary: A TLS 1.3 connection using certificate compression can be forced to allocate a large buffer before decompression without checking against the configured certificate size limit. Impact summary: An attacker can cause per-connection memory allocations of up to approximately 22 MiB and extra CPU work, potentially leading to service degradation or resource exhaustion (Denial of Service). In affected configurations, the peer-supplied uncompressed certificate length from a CompressedCertificate message is used to grow a heap buffer prior to decompression. This length is not bounded by the max_cert_list setting, which otherwise constrains certificate message sizes. An attacker can exploit this to cause large per-connection allocations followed by handshake failure. No memory corruption or information disclosure occurs. This issue only affects builds where TLS 1.3 certificate compression is compiled in (i.e., not OPENSSL_NO_COMP_ALG) and at least one compression algorithm (brotli, zlib, or zstd) is available, and where the compression extension is negotiated. Both clients receiving a server CompressedCertificate and servers in mutual TLS scenarios receiving a client CompressedCertificate are affected. Servers that do not request client certificates are not vulnerable to client-initiated attacks. Users can mitigate this issue by setting SSL_OP_NO_RX_CERTIFICATE_COMPRESSION to disable receiving compressed certificates. The FIPS modules in 3.6, 3.5, 3.4 and 3.3 are not affected by this issue, as the TLS implementation is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary. OpenSSL 3.6, 3.5, 3.4 and 3.3 are vulnerable to this issue. OpenSSL 3.0, 1.1.1 and 1.0.2 are not affected by this issue.
CVE-2025-67645 1 Openemr 1 Openemr 2026-01-29 8.8 High
OpenEMR is a free and open source electronic health records and medical practice management application. Versions prior to 7.0.4 have a broken access control in the Profile Edit endpoint. An authenticated normal user can modify the request parameters (pubpid / pid) to reference another user’s record; the server accepts the modified IDs and applies the changes to that other user’s profile. This allows one user to alter another user’s profile data (name, contact info, etc.), and could enable account takeover. Version 7.0.4 fixes the issue.
CVE-2025-69418 1 Openssl 1 Openssl 2026-01-29 4 Medium
Issue summary: When using the low-level OCB API directly with AES-NI or<br>other hardware-accelerated code paths, inputs whose length is not a multiple<br>of 16 bytes can leave the final partial block unencrypted and unauthenticated.<br><br>Impact summary: The trailing 1-15 bytes of a message may be exposed in<br>cleartext on encryption and are not covered by the authentication tag,<br>allowing an attacker to read or tamper with those bytes without detection.<br><br>The low-level OCB encrypt and decrypt routines in the hardware-accelerated<br>stream path process full 16-byte blocks but do not advance the input/output<br>pointers. The subsequent tail-handling code then operates on the original<br>base pointers, effectively reprocessing the beginning of the buffer while<br>leaving the actual trailing bytes unprocessed. The authentication checksum<br>also excludes the true tail bytes.<br><br>However, typical OpenSSL consumers using EVP are not affected because the<br>higher-level EVP and provider OCB implementations split inputs so that full<br>blocks and trailing partial blocks are processed in separate calls, avoiding<br>the problematic code path. Additionally, TLS does not use OCB ciphersuites.<br>The vulnerability only affects applications that call the low-level<br>CRYPTO_ocb128_encrypt() or CRYPTO_ocb128_decrypt() functions directly with<br>non-block-aligned lengths in a single call on hardware-accelerated builds.<br>For these reasons the issue was assessed as Low severity.<br><br>The FIPS modules in 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected<br>by this issue, as OCB mode is not a FIPS-approved algorithm.<br><br>OpenSSL 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.0 and 1.1.1 are vulnerable to this issue.<br><br>OpenSSL 1.0.2 is not affected by this issue.
CVE-2025-69565 1 Code-projects 1 Mobile Shop Management System 2026-01-29 9.8 Critical
code-projects Mobile Shop Management System 1.0 is vulnerable to File Upload in /ExAddProduct.php.
CVE-2026-0919 1 Tp-link 3 Tapo, Tapo C220 V1, Tapo C520ws V2 2026-01-29 N/A
The HTTP parser of Tapo C220 v1 and C520WS v2 cameras improperly handles requests containing an excessively long URL path. An invalid‑URL error path continues into cleanup code that assumes allocated buffers exist, leading to a crash and service restart. An unauthenticated attacker can force repeated service crashes or device reboots, causing denial of service.
CVE-2026-1472 1 Quatuor 1 Evaluacion De Desempeno 2026-01-29 N/A
An out-of-band SQL injection vulnerability (OOB SQLi) has been detected in the Performance Evaluation (EDD) application developed by Gabinete Técnico de Programación. Exploiting this vulnerability in the parameter 'txAny' in '/evaluacion_competencias_autoeval_list.aspx', could allow an attacker to extract sensitive information from the database through external channels, without the affected application returning the data directly, compromising the confidentiality of the stored information.
CVE-2026-1479 1 Quatuor 1 Evaluacion De Desempeno 2026-01-29 N/A
An out-of-band SQL injection vulnerability (OOB SQLi) has been detected in the Performance Evaluation (EDD) application developed by Gabinete Técnico de Programación. Exploiting this vulnerability in the parameters 'Id_usuario' and 'Id_evaluacion’ in ‘/evaluacion_hca_ver_auto.asp', could allow an attacker to extract sensitive information from the database through external channels, without the affected application returning the data directly, compromising the confidentiality of the stored information.
CVE-2025-12810 1 Delinea 1 Secret Server 2026-01-29 N/A
Improper Authentication vulnerability in Delinea Inc. Secret Server On-Prem (RPC Password Rotation modules).This issue affects Secret Server On-Prem: 11.8.1, 11.9.6, 11.9.25. A secret with "change password on check in" enabled automatically checks in even when the password change fails after reaching its retry limit. This leaves the secret in an inconsistent state with the wrong password. Remediation: Upgrade to 11.9.47 or later. The secret will remain checked out when the password change fails.
CVE-2025-15467 1 Openssl 1 Openssl 2026-01-29 9.8 Critical
Issue summary: Parsing CMS AuthEnvelopedData message with maliciously crafted AEAD parameters can trigger a stack buffer overflow. Impact summary: A stack buffer overflow may lead to a crash, causing Denial of Service, or potentially remote code execution. When parsing CMS AuthEnvelopedData structures that use AEAD ciphers such as AES-GCM, the IV (Initialization Vector) encoded in the ASN.1 parameters is copied into a fixed-size stack buffer without verifying that its length fits the destination. An attacker can supply a crafted CMS message with an oversized IV, causing a stack-based out-of-bounds write before any authentication or tag verification occurs. Applications and services that parse untrusted CMS or PKCS#7 content using AEAD ciphers (e.g., S/MIME AuthEnvelopedData with AES-GCM) are vulnerable. Because the overflow occurs prior to authentication, no valid key material is required to trigger it. While exploitability to remote code execution depends on platform and toolchain mitigations, the stack-based write primitive represents a severe risk. The FIPS modules in 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as the CMS implementation is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary. OpenSSL 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3 and 3.0 are vulnerable to this issue. OpenSSL 1.1.1 and 1.0.2 are not affected by this issue.
CVE-2026-23892 1 Octoprint 1 Octoprint 2026-01-29 N/A
OctoPrint provides a web interface for controlling consumer 3D printers. OctoPrint versions up to and including 1.11.5 are affected by a (theoretical) timing attack vulnerability that allows API key extraction over the network. Due to using character based comparison that short-circuits on the first mismatched character during API key validation, rather than a cryptographical method with static runtime regardless of the point of mismatch, an attacker with network based access to an affected OctoPrint could extract API keys valid on the instance by measuring the response times of the denied access responses and guess an API key character by character. The vulnerability is patched in version 1.11.6. The likelihood of this attack actually working is highly dependent on the network's latency, noise and similar parameters. An actual proof of concept was not achieved so far. Still, as always administrators are advised to not expose their OctoPrint instance on hostile networks, especially not on the public Internet.