| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| The User Registration & Membership – Custom Registration Form Builder, Custom Login Form, User Profile, Content Restriction & Membership Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 4.4.8. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'process_row_actions' function with the 'delete' action. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete arbitrary post via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| A CSRF issue in index.php in QloApps hotel eCommerce 1.5.1 allows an attacker to change the admin's email address via a crafted HTML document. |
| React Router is a router for React. In @remix-run/server-runtime version prior to 2.17.3. and react-router 7.0.0 through 7.11.0, React Router (or Remix v2) is vulnerable to CSRF attacks on document POST requests to UI routes when using server-side route action handlers in Framework Mode, or when using React Server Actions in the new unstable RSC modes. There is no impact if Declarative Mode (<BrowserRouter>) or Data Mode (createBrowserRouter/<RouterProvider>) is being used. This issue has been patched in @remix-run/server-runtime version 2.17.3 and react-router version 7.12.0. |
| Weblate is a web based localization tool. The Create Component functionality in Weblate allows authorized users to add new translation components by specifying both a version control system and a source code repository URL to pull from. However, prior to version 5.15, the repository URL field is not validated or sanitized, allowing an attacker to supply arbitrary protocols, hostnames, and IP addresses, including localhost, internal network addresses, and local filenames. When the Mercurial version control system is selected, Weblate exposes the full server-side HTTP response for the provided URL. This effectively creates a server-side request forgery (SSRF) primitive that can probe internal services and return their contents. In addition to accessing internal HTTP endpoints, the behavior also enables local file enumeration by attempting file:// requests. While file contents may not always be returned, the application’s error messages clearly differentiate between files that exist and files that do not, revealing information about the server’s filesystem layout. In cloud environments, this behavior is particularly dangerous, as internal-only endpoints such as cloud metadata services may be accessible, potentially leading to credential disclosure and full environment compromise. This has been addressed in the Weblate 5.15 release. As a workaround, remove Mercurial from `VCS_BACKENDS`; the Git backend is not affected. The Git backend was already configured to block the file protocol and does not expose the HTTP response content in the error message. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Restajet Information Technologies Inc. Online Food Delivery System allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Online Food Delivery System: through 19122025. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Rara Theme Education Zone allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Education Zone: from n/a through 1.3.4. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Rara Theme Chic Lite allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Chic Lite: from n/a through 1.1.3. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Blossom Themes Blossom Shop allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Blossom Shop: from n/a through 1.1.7. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Blossom Themes Vilva allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Vilva: from n/a through 1.2.2. |
| The CBX Restaurant Booking WordPress plugin through 1.2.1 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack |
| The Contact Us By Lord Linus WordPress plugin through 2.6 does not have CSRF check in some places, and is missing sanitisation as well as escaping, which could allow attackers to make logged in admin add Stored XSS payloads via a CSRF attack. |
| The TAX SERVICE Electronic HDM WordPress plugin before 1.2.1 does not authorization and CSRF checks in an AJAX action, allowing unauthenticated users to import and execute arbitrary SQL statements |
| The Newsletter Popup WordPress plugin through 1.2 does not have CSRF check when deleting list, which could allow attackers to make logged in admins perform such action via a CSRF attack |
| The WP Prayer WordPress plugin through 2.0.9 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its email settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack |
| The Altra Side Menu WordPress plugin through 2.0 does not have CSRF checks in some places, which could allow attackers to make logged in admins delete arbitrary menu via a CSRF attack |
| The WP Plugin Lister WordPress plugin through 2.1.0 does not have CSRF check in some places, and is missing sanitisation as well as escaping, which could allow attackers to make logged in admin add Stored XSS payloads via a CSRF attack. |
| The WP Fastest Cache WordPress plugin before 0.9.5 is lacking a CSRF check in its wpfc_save_cdn_integration AJAX action, and does not sanitise and escape some the options available via the action, which could allow attackers to make logged in high privilege users call it and set a Cross-Site Scripting payload |
| The CommentTweets WordPress plugin through 0.6 does not have CSRF checks in some places, which could allow attackers to make logged in users perform unwanted actions via CSRF attacks |
| The Construction Light WordPress theme before 1.6.8 does not have authorisation and CSRF when activating via an AJAX action, allowing any authenticated users, such as subscriber to activate arbitrary . |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) weaknesses [CWE-352] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAIOps 2.0.0 may allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to perform arbitrary actions on behalf of an authenticated user via tricking the victim to execute malicious GET requests. |
